01 Jan 2000
Home  »    »   Battle Los Angeles 2011

Battle Los Angeles 2011

Posted in HomeBy adminOn 18/11/17

Battle of Los Angeles Wikipedia. During the course of a fireside report to the nation delivered by President Roosevelt on 2. February 1. 94. 2, a Japanese submarine rose out of the sea off Ellwood, a hamlet on the California coast north of Santa Barbara, and pumped thirteen shells into tidewater refinery installations. The shots seemed designed to punctuate the Presidents statement that the broad oceans which have been heralded in the past as our protection from attack have become endless battlefields on which we are constantly being challenged by our enemies. Yet the attack which was supposed to carry the enemys defiance, and which did succeed in stealing headlines from the Presidents address, was a feeble gesture rather than a damaging blow. The raider surfaced at 1. Pacific time, just five minutes after the President started his speech. For about twenty minutes the submarine kept a position 2,5. The shells did minor damage to piers and oil wells, but missed the gasoline plant, which appears to have been the aiming point the military effects of the raid were therefore nil. The first news of the attack led to the dispatch of pursuit planes to the area, and subsequently three bombers joined the attempt to destroy the raider, but without success. The reluctance of AAF commanders to assign larger forces to the task resulted from their belief that such a raid as this would be employed by the enemy to divert attention from a major air task force which would hurl its planes against a really significant target. Loyal Japanese Americans who had predicted that a demonstration would be made in connection with the Presidents speech also prophesied that Los Angeles would be attacked the next night. The Army, too, was convinced that some new action impended, and took all possible precautions. Newspapers were permitted to announce that a strict state of readiness against renewed attacks had been imposed, and there followed the confused action known as The Battle of Los Angeles. During the night of 2. February 1. 94. 2, unidentified objects caused a succession of alerts in southern California. On the 2. 4th, a warning issued by naval intelligence indicated that an attack could be expected within the next ten hours. That evening a large number of flares and blinking lights were reported from the vicinity of defense plants. Sql 2008 R2 Enterprise Iso on this page. An alert called at 1. RtyMYoaDfDZeYvyMZheq7ARhf.jpg' alt='Battle Los Angeles 2011' title='Battle Los Angeles 2011' />Pacific time was lifted at 2. But early in the morning of the 2. Radars picked up an unidentified target 1. Los Angeles. Antiaircraft batteries were alerted at 0. Green Alertready to firea few minutes later. The AAF kept its pursuit planes on the ground, preferring to await indications of the scale and direction of any attack before committing its limited fighter force. Radars tracked the approaching target to within a few miles of the coast, and at 0. Battle Los Angeles 2011' title='Battle Los Angeles 2011' />Thereafter the information center was flooded with reports of enemy planes, even though the mysterious object tracked in from sea seems to have vanished. At 0. 24. 3, planes were reported near Long Beach, and a few minutes later a coast artillery colonel spotted about 2. Los Angeles. At 0. Santa Monica and four batteries of anti aircraft artillery opened fire, whereupon the air over Los Angeles erupted like a volcano. From this point on reports were hopelessly at variance. Probably much of the confusion came from the fact that anti aircraft shell bursts, caught by the searchlights, were themselves mistaken for enemy planes. In any case, the next three hours produced some of the most imaginative reporting of the war swarms of planes or, sometimes, balloons of all possible sizes, numbering from one to several hundred, traveling at altitudes which ranged from a few thousand feet to more than 2. These mysterious forces dropped no bombs and, despite the fact that 1,4. Battle Los Angeles is noisy, violent, ugly and stupid. Its manufacture is a reflection of appalling cynicism on the part of its makers, who dont even try to. LACMA Los Angeles County Museum of Art. Largest art museum in the West inspires creativity and dialogue. Connect with cultures from ancient times to the present. There were reports, to be sure, that four enemy planes had been shot down, and one was supposed to have landed in flames at a Hollywood intersection. Residents in a forty mile arc along the coast watched from hills or rooftops as the play of guns and searchlights provided the first real drama of the war for citizens of the mainland. The Battle of Los Angeles, also known as The Great Los Angeles Air Raid, is the name given by contemporary sources to the rumored enemy attack and subsequent anti. Battle Los Angeles also known as Battle LA and internationally as World Invasion Battle Los Angeles is a 2011 American military science fiction war film directed. For more than a decade, the battle over samesex marriage and other rights for gay couples has been hard fought in U. S. courts and legislatures and at the ballot box. Tickets for Basketball games buy Los Angeles Sparks Basketball single game tickets at Ticketmaster. Find game schedules and team promotions. Battle Los Angeles soms ook wel Battle LA en World Invasion Battle Los Angeles genoemd is een militaire sciencefictionfilm uit 2011 met onder andere Jonathan. Argumento. En agosto de 2011, el Sargento Michael Nantz Aaron Eckhart del Cuerpo de Marines de los Estados Unidos se apresta a retirarse a peticin propia tras 20. Directed by Jonathan Liebesman. With Aaron Eckhart, Michelle Rodriguez, Bridget Moynahan, Ramon Rodriguez. A squadron of U. S. Marines becomes the last line of defense. Battle Los Angeles 2011' title='Battle Los Angeles 2011' />Battle Los Angeles 2011The dawn, which ended the shooting and the fantasy, also proved that the only damage which resulted to the city was such as had been caused by the excitement there was at least one death from heart failure, by traffic accidents in the blacked out streets, or by shell fragments from the artillery barrage. Attempts to arrive at an explanation of the incident quickly became as involved and mysterious as the battle itself. The Navy immediately insisted that there was no evidence of the presence of enemy planes, and Secretary of the Navy, Frank Knox announced at a press conference on 2. February that the raid was just a false alarm. At the same conference he admitted that attacks were always possible and indicated that vital industries located along the coast ought to be moved inland. The Army had a hard time making up its mind on the cause of the alert. A report to Washington, made by the Western Defense Command shortly after the raid had ended, indicated that the credibility of reports of an attack had begun to be shaken before the blackout was lifted. This message predicted that developments would prove that most previous reports had been greatly exaggerated. The Fourth Air Force had indicated its belief that there were no planes over Los Angeles. But the Army did not publish these initial conclusions. Instead, it waited a day, until after a thorough examination of witnesses had been finished. On the basis of these hearings, local commanders altered their verdict and indicated a belief that from one to five unidentified airplanes had been over Los Angeles. Secretary Stimson announced this conclusion as the War Department version of the incident, and he advanced two theories to account for the mysterious craft either they were commercial planes operated by an enemy from secret fields in California or Mexico, or they were light planes launched from Japanese submarines. In either case, the enemys purpose must have been to locate anti aircraft defenses in the area or to deliver a blow at civilian morale. The divergence of views between the War and Navy departments, and the unsatisfying conjectures advanced by the Army to explain the affair, touched off a vigorous public discussion. The Los Angeles Times, in a first page editorial on 2. February, announced that the considerable public excitement and confusion caused by the alert, as well as its spectacular official accompaniments, demanded a careful explanation. Fears were expressed lest a few phony raids undermine the confidence of civilian volunteers in the aircraft warning service. In the United States Congress, Representative Leland Ford wanted to know whether the incident was a practice raid, or a raid to throw a scare into 2,0. Southern Californias war industries. Wendell Willkie, speaking in Los Angeles on 2. Resident Evil 5 Pc Game Full Version Compressed here. February, assured Californians on the basis of his experiences in England that when a real air raid began you wont have to argue about ityoull just know. He conceded that military authorities had been correct in calling a precautionary alert but deplored the lack of agreement between the Army and Navy. A strong editorial in the Washington Post on 2. February called the handling of the Los Angeles episode a recipe for jitters, and censured the military authorities for what it called stubborn silence in the face of widespread uncertainty.